Yacht rock did not exist when the music was made. It exists now because platforms needed a word for comfort. The label is not descriptive so much as managerial—a way to group sounds that are smooth, reliable, and incapable of causing friction in public or private space. In that sense, yacht rock is not a rediscovery. It is a continuation.
It is corporate rock, updated for the streaming age.
In the 1980s, corporate rock was blunt about its function. It lived on FM radio, soundtracked office towers, and mirrored the values of stability, scale, and upward mobility. Its production was clean, its musicianship professional, its emotional range carefully bounded. It did not challenge power. It synchronized with it. Yacht rock inherits this logic almost intact, but now it arrives disguised as irony, nostalgia, and “good vibes.”
The rebrand is softer, but the structure is the same.
Today, this music circulates less through radio than through playlists—most prominently on Spotify—where yacht rock thrives as algorithmic wallpaper. It appears in playlists built around leisure, productivity, and male self-mythology: driving, working out, on the beach, “classic cool,” or—if you are well-off enough— actually yachting. These lists are rarely overtly ideological, which is precisely the point. They flatten history into mood. They remove conflict. They turn music into a solvent.
This is where the banality becomes unmistakable.
Streaming does not care about context. It cares about flow. Yacht rock excels at flow. The tracks are mid-tempo, harmonically pleasing, rhythmically stable. They do not interrupt. They do not demand attention. They are as safe as elevator muzak—engineered to fill silence without ever questioning why the silence is there.
The effect is reassuring, even narcotic. It allows the listener—often a corporate-type, affluent, middle-aged man—to feel tasteful without being challenged. Excess without guilt. Nostalgia without reckoning.
The men have changed uniforms. The power suit has become the white sport shirt. The leather loafer has become Crocs—or, for many Pinoys, a pair of Onitsuka Tiger sneakers. The attitude remains untouched.
What makes this particularly cynical is how many artists get flattened in the process. Steely Dan are reduced to “smooth,” despite writing some of the most caustic, morally acidic songs in rock history. Toto are framed as soft rock despite being elite studio musicians with deep jazz and progressive roots. The Doobie Brothers’ Michael McDonald era becomes shorthand for slickness, ignoring its debt to soul discipline. Hall & Oates are absorbed into the category despite their grounding in rhythm-and-blues traditions. Christopher Cross is dismissed as excess incarnate, punished less for the music than for sincerity.
These artists were not making lifestyle playlists. They were responding to industrial pressures: the rise of studio technology, the collapse of earlier rock mythologies, and the demand for precision over chaos. That tension has been erased by streaming logic, which does not distinguish between intention and utility. Everything becomes content.
Outside the US of A, the effect is arguably more corrosive. This sound circulated globally as a signal of modernity—English-language rock polished enough to imply access, success, and proximity to Western capital. Streaming has amplified that legacy, circulating the same narrow aesthetic endlessly, detached from geography, politics, or history. What once marked aspiration now marks comfort.
This is why yacht rock is best understood not as a genre but as a condition.
Corporate rock once represented rock’s compromise with power. Yacht rock represents rock’s surrender to convenience. The rebellion is gone. The argument is gone. What remains is music optimized to disappear into the background while sounding expensive.
It floats well. It streams well. It offends no one.
And in a system designed to reward frictionless consumption, that safety is not a side effect. It is the product. >>autoceremony]
No comments:
Post a Comment