by autoceremony.
If history were a teacher, it would have resigned by now—burned out, hoarse from shouting the same warning across centuries while students keep copying from the same old cheat sheet titled “This Time It’ll Be Different.” Every generation swears it knows better. Every generation still lines up for the authoritarian shortcut when things get uncomfortable.
The question is no longer why fascism is bad. That part is settled. The real question—the one we keep dodging—is why it keeps selling so well, even after the receipts are stacked high with corpses, censored books, and ruined economies.
I’ll start with an uncomfortable admission: people don’t fall for authoritarian leaders because they’re ignorant of history. They fall for them because history doesn’t lower food prices, doesn’t guarantee safety, doesn’t pay the bills, and doesn’t answer the daily anxiety of living in a system that feels rigged. Especially when it seems that the rich gets richer and the poor stays poor.
Democracy, in practice, has a branding problem. Authoritarianism doesn’t.
Authoritarian leaders don’t campaign on repression. They campaign on relief—relief from chaos, relief from humiliation, relief from the exhausting demand to think critically in a world that feels perpetually on fire. They offer certainty at a time when democratic systems respond with process, committees, and footnotes.
And fear, when it shows up, doesn’t care about nuance.
Psychologists have been telling us this for decades. Under threat—economic collapse, cultural displacement, pandemics, war—people gravitate toward authority, hierarchy, and simplicity. Not because they’re evil, but because fear collapses the imagination. When survival feels at stake, pluralism starts to feel like a luxury. Strongmen understand this intuitively. They don’t argue policy. They perform control.
History textbooks tend to flatten fascism into uniforms, salutes, and mustache-twirling villains. Reality was far more banal—and far more dangerous. Fascism didn’t rise because people woke up one morning craving dictatorship. It rose because democracy failed to deliver stability fast enough, fairness clearly enough, and dignity broadly enough. The strongman didn’t replace democracy; he exploited its hollowed-out version.
This is where the line “we’ve learned from history” becomes convenient. Learning history is passive. Defending its lessons is labor.
Most supporters of authoritarian leaders don’t see themselves as authoritarians. They see themselves as realists. They say things like, “I don’t like him, but he gets things done,” or “We just need someone tough right now,” or the classic, “It’s only temporary.” Temporary is how most freedoms die—under the promise of later.
Authoritarianism rarely arrives by tearing up the constitution on day one. It arrives legally, procedurally, even politely. Courts are packed, not abolished. Media is “regulated,” not banned. Opponents are “investigated,” not disappeared—until they are. Each step is defensible in isolation. Together, they form a cage.
And once people are invested emotionally, walking it back becomes almost impossible. Authoritarian movements are not built on logic; they’re built on identity. An “us” under siege by a “them.” Elites. Journalists. Academics. Minorities. And in the case of the US right now, immigrants. Pick a villain, any villain. Complexity becomes betrayal. Criticism becomes treason.
At that point, facts stop functioning as information and start functioning as insults.
This isn’t accidental. It’s engineered. Modern authoritarianism has upgraded its toolset. Where 20th-century strongmen relied on radio and mass rallies, today’s version runs on algorithms, outrage economics, and meme warfare. The goal isn’t to convince—it’s to exhaust. To flood the space with so much noise that people stop asking what’s true and start asking who sounds strong.
Truth requires attention. Rage is frictionless.
And here’s where liberal democracies need to stop congratulating themselves and start taking responsibility, because authoritarianism doesn’t thrive in a vacuum. It thrives in the wreckage of broken promises.
When democracy becomes synonymous with stagnant wages, insecure work, captured institutions, endless wars sold as “values,” and elites who never seem to lose, people don’t abandon democracy out of ideological curiosity. They abandon it out of spite and despair. The strongman steps in not because he has better solutions, but because he offers a target—and a narrative where suffering is someone else’s fault.
That narrative is powerful. It turns economic anxiety into moral certainty. It turns personal failure into collective grievance. It turns nostalgia into policy. The past becomes a mythic golden age scrubbed clean of its victims. “We were great once” is easier to sell than “we need to restructure power and wealth.”
Democracy, when it works, is boring. It’s compromise, slow reforms, incremental gains, and constant vigilance. Authoritarianism is theater. It’s decisive gestures, enemies named, and the intoxicating feeling of belonging to something righteous and loud.
So no, history didn’t fail us. We failed to maintain the conditions that make its lessons stick.
Fascism doesn’t return because people forgot concentration camps or martial law. It returns because inequality deepens, institutions lose credibility, and fear finds a microphone. It returns because cruelty gets rebranded as strength when empathy feels unaffordable.
If we want fewer authoritarian leaders, we need fewer desperate citizens. That means material security, real accountability, media systems that don’t reward outrage by default, and a politics that delivers dignity without demanding obedience.
Otherwise, history will keep screaming into the void—and we’ll keep applauding the loudest man in the room, wondering later how the doors quietly locked behind us.
No comments:
Post a Comment